
Flannery O’Connor’s Mystery and Manners
April 25, 2008A blog is a place of such good intention.
I was thinking about this blog the other day, reflecting on the fact that I have this one entry that just kind of sits, and in the meantime, months have gone by and I haven’t added a thing. The only thing that gives me any consolation is the fact that I look at my friends’ blogs, and most of them do one entry every three or so months. It helps me to feel right on track.
As part of my class, I have been reading some selections out of Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners, which has been delightful and insightful. To this point, the point that continues to return to me is from the article “The Fiction Writer and His Country” (published originally as a Life editorial), in which O’Connor is challenging the critique that American novelists are not speaking for America. O’Connor refutes the argument that Southern writing, a category that encompasses her own work, is too grotesque and does not genuinely reflect the prosperity and joy of life in American.
Not only does she question this categorization of the American life (“[The writer] may at least be permitted to ask if these screams for joy would be quite so piercing if joy were really more abundant in our prosperous society”) and that writers “write about rot because they love it” (“…some write about rot because they see it and recognize it for what it is”), she also makes an important point that a Christian writer often has the sharpest eyes to see the grotesque and perverse, and when she writes about such things, it is from the very perspective that recognizes it as such.
“Redemption is meaningless unless there is a cause for it in the actual life we live,” she declares.
This particular line has come to me again and again as a reminder and inspiration. More thoughts on this to come.

Hi Byrd:
I found your blog through google alerts and wonder if you would visit my blog when you have a chance. I just created it for a recent class project (major American author course on Flannery O’Connor. Of course it is a work in progress so you will find many holes, but I think you might find some interesting things. I wonder if I may put your site on my blogroll (I still have to create that)?
Miss Flannery,
Thanks for the note, I will definitely visit your blog. And I would be honored if you added me to your blogroll. I will do the same (if there’s no objection!).
Byrd
I love Flannery O’Connor! I have being trying for 20 years to figure out a way to require a couple of her stories in my classes. I think the jump would be to hard for most divinity students, who seem seldom to think outside the church-box….
It’s too bad that the “obstacle” is too often the case, especially because Flannery has so much insight about expression and communication from a Christian perspective. That seems to touch on some issues you brought up in the OT Theology class–interpretation as an art. It reminds me, too, of when you talked about counsel someone (forgot whom!) gave you to take classes in photography and Shakespeare for increasing skill in preaching.
Location says : I absolutely agree with this !
Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation
Anyway … nice blog to visit.
cheers, Hypostasis!!!